30 November 2015 | Soulier Bunch
Neither the public policy nature of the provisions set forth in Article L. 442-6 of the French Commercial Code nor the exclusive jurisdiction granted to judicial courts to hear restrictive trade practices related cases – including cases concerning the sudden breach of an established business relationship – precludes the use of arbitration to settle disputes […]
Read more
30 November 2015 | Soulier Bunch
A decision handed down by the Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court) on September 16, 2015 (n° 14-16.713) provides an answer to a problem that arose in connection with the termination of a trial period for which the company had to comply with both the “délai de prévenance” (i.e. an advance notice period that must […]
Read more
30 November 2015 | Soulier Bunch
Wherever the ownership of equity shares is dismembered, when the shareholders resolve to pay a dividend out of distributable reserves, the right of use enjoyed by the beneficial owner of the equity shares applies – unless otherwise agreed upon between the beneficial owner and the bare owner – in the form of a quasi-usufruct to […]
Read more
29 October 2015 | Laure Marolleau
Unilateral (or asymmetrical) jurisdiction clauses may vary in form and nature. However, such clauses always provide for an option to only one of the parties allowing it to choose the court that will be competent in case of a dispute. The validity of such unilateral jurisdiction clauses has been brought into question by several jurisdictions, […]
Read more
29 October 2015 | Soulier Bunch
To assess the length of an established business relationship and determine the notice period that ought to be applied prior to the effective termination thereof, the length of the business relationship that preceded the sale of a business going concern must not be taken into account wherever it is not demonstrated that the purchaser of […]
Read more